Lispa for Financial technology

The edge cases matter.
Give them a team.

Payment retries, reconciliation jobs, and account dashboards deserve more than a happy-path test. Put Lispa to work on a specific failure and review the code and evidence together.

Start with Lispa →Find your first task ↓

See plans and usage charges

Lispa egg agents illustrate make the numbers agree for financial technology. — Works with
Claude
Codex
Grok
Gemini
Open models

From your backlog to a clear brief

Three useful places to start.

Use a payment sandbox and synthetic transactions. Specify the accounting behavior and approval boundaries your team expects.

01 / Suggested task

Make a retry repeatable.

The same webhook arrives twice. Ask Lispa to reproduce the duplicate event and test how the handler responds.

Ask for

A duplicate-event fixture, a focused patch, and regression evidence.

Use this starter prompt

MAKE IT YOURS

In [repository], reproduce duplicate delivery to [webhook handler] using sandbox events. Check sequential and concurrent retries and failed acknowledgements. Implement the agreed idempotent behavior, run regression tests, and report remaining gaps. Do not use live payment credentials, merge, or deploy.

See the full workflow →

02 / Suggested task

Explain a reconciliation mismatch.

Two exports disagree. Trace the transformation with synthetic examples instead of asking someone to eyeball every row.

Ask for

A documented mismatch, boundary-case tests, and a reviewable change.

Use this starter prompt

MAKE IT YOURS

Review [reconciliation module] against [expected rules]. Build synthetic cases for rounding, missing entries, duplicate IDs, and day-boundary timestamps. Trace each mismatch to the code and propose a focused fix with test evidence. Flag ambiguous business rules for review. Do not modify live balances.

See the full workflow →

03 / Suggested task

Check the account experience.

Loading, empty, and error states are part of the product too. Inspect them at desktop and phone sizes.

Ask for

Browser checks covering the states a customer can actually encounter.

Use this starter prompt

MAKE IT YOURS

Exercise [account dashboard] in [test environment] with synthetic data. Check loading, empty, permission-denied, and API-error states on desktop and phone. Fix [agreed UI issue], run relevant checks, and attach screenshots. Do not change financial calculations or deploy.

See the full workflow →

Suggested engineering workflows, not customer case studies. Adapt the brief and review the result with your team.

Inside Lispa / Pull requests & follow-up

Review the change, checks, and findings in the same workspace.

Inspect the change, the latest agent review, and the CI checks together. Ask Lispa to follow up on new commits, address feedback, and keep checking the result.

Explore pull requests & follow-up →

Works with

Claude
Codex
Grok
Gemini
Open models

Actual Lispa pull-request workspace with fictional changes, checks and a review result. — Actual Lispa interface · Fictional demo data · Shared product exampleView full size ↗

Inside Lispa / Tasks & bug fixes

Turn a complicated failure into focused tasks with visible results.

Break a broad request into focused tasks. Keep dependencies, active work, and results in view while agents investigate bugs or work through failing checks.

Explore tasks & bug fixes →