Beyond “it compiles”

It builds. Great.
Now, does it work?

The button under the fold. The empty state nobody tried. Ask Lispa to use your web app in a browser and check the experience behind the code.

Continue with GoogleSee an example

From $20/month, with $20 in usage credits. More signup options

AI agents inspect a desktop application and its phone layout, with a checklist and clock beside them.
One team. A little less on your plate.
Works with
  • Claude
  • Codex
  • Grok
  • Gemini
  • Open models
Works in your repositoryChoose your modelsReview the work before it ships
A task you can hand off

Your users do not experience a test log.

They open the menu, fill in a form, and try again after an error. A layout can look fine on a laptop and hide the submit button on a phone. Give Lispa the journey to exercise.

You ask

“Check the signup flow on desktop and a narrow phone viewport. Try an invalid email, an existing account, and a successful signup using test data. Record any failures.”

Signup flow checkExample browser report · Test environment
Example
What to look for in the result
  1. 01
    Desktop

    Form, validation message, and success state.

  2. 02
    Mobile

    Keyboard focus, menu, and submit visibility.

  3. 03
    Evidence

    Screenshots and steps for each observed issue.

Browser observations + screenshots + test changes
Illustrative workflow with fictional data. Not a live run or a guaranteed result.
Inside Lispa

The browser belongs beside the task.

Follow the application in the Browser panel alongside the conversation. Compare the visible behavior with the agent’s notes, then ask it to check the state that matters next.

Try it with your own task
Illustration of a Lispa task with its conversation and a browser preview of a keyboard-accessible command menu.
Existing AI-generated product illustration with fictional example data.View full size
From handoff to review

A clear brief.
A result you can check.

  1. 01

    Point to a test environment.

    Provide the start command or preview URL, disposable account details, and the flows that matter. Define actions to avoid.

  2. 02

    Exercise the experience.

    Ask the agent to use the browser, try error states, and inspect chosen viewport sizes. You can follow the browser beside the chat.

  3. 03

    Make the useful checks repeatable.

    Request regression tests in your existing test framework. Review screenshots, results, and any environment limitations.

A closer look at Lispa

The work has a home.

From the first brief to the next useful lesson. Take a look around the workspace.

Explore the full illustrated walkthrough
Tasks

Know what needs your attention.

See who is working on each task, which work depends on it, and what is ready for your review. The small pieces stay connected to the goal.

Works with
  • Claude
  • Codex
  • Grok
  • Gemini
  • Open models
Lispa task list grouped into in progress, in review, and done, with a different agent or team assigned to each task.
Actual Lispa interface · Fictional demo dataView full size
Pull requests

Bring the evidence to the review.

Pull requests, agent reviews, and CI checks share a view. Inspect the current change and its latest review before deciding what should ship.

Works with
  • Claude
  • Codex
  • Grok
  • Gemini
  • Open models
Lispa pull request workspace with three changes, the selected payment fix, passed checks, and its latest review.
Actual Lispa interface · Fictional demo dataView full size
Built & used in Lispa

“Improve this. It is not clear.”

That feedback became a focused chart improvement in Lispa: 14, 30, and 90 day views, a labelled count axis, and readable dates. The work also extracted the chart calculations into a separate module.

The change was merged after chart checks and a visual preview covering range selection, hover, and the empty state.

The shipped Lispa activity chart with a labelled count axis, readable dates, and 14, 30, and 90 day controls, using demo data.
Shipped chart improved through Lispa. All counts shown are fictional demo data.View full size
Try it on your own backlog

A useful first task,
ready to make yours.

Replace the brackets, paste into a Lispa chat, and keep the scope small enough to review.

  • Observed behavior at the requested viewports
  • Reproduction steps and visual evidence
  • Repeatable tests for the flows you choose
YOUR STARTER PROMPT

Start [application] using [command] and test [flow] at desktop and phone widths. Use only [test environment and disposable data]. Check success, validation, empty, and error states. Capture screenshots of issues and add regression tests using the existing framework. Report what ran and what was blocked. Do not use real payments, contact customers, or merge.

Start a task in Lispa
Before you start

A few practical
answers.

Plans and usage charges
Can Lispa inspect mobile layouts?

Yes. Ask it to check specific browser viewport sizes. This checks responsive web behavior; it is not a substitute for testing on every physical device.

Can it test an app that needs a login?

Provide an accessible test environment and an appropriate test account through your workspace. Use disposable data and make the allowed actions explicit.

Will the screenshots prove every flow works?

No. Screenshots document visible states. Pair them with interaction checks and automated tests for the behaviors that matter. Results depend on the environment and coverage you request.

Can I use my existing model plan?

You can connect a supported Claude or ChatGPT plan, a provider API key, or use Lispa’s models with credits. Provider limits still apply. Cloud machines and Lispa services consume credits even when you bring a plan.

Start with one real task

Check the journey before your users do.

Connect your repo. Describe the work.
Come back to a result you can inspect.

Start with Lispa

Lite starts at $20/month with $20 in usage credits.
Paid plan required to run tasks. Cancel any time.

See plans and usage charges